You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘fact checkers’ category.
You heard it here first. More on this later, but first all need to work to make hemp completely legal… Hemp is God’s gift to America, and I don’t mean when it goes up in smoke. I am speaking of fibers…
Begin educating those who won’t vote for hemp legalization….
The hemp plant is a renewable resource..
Hemp enriches the soil it grows in. …
Hempseeds and hemp oil are highly nutritious and delicious…
Hemp is the only plant that contains all of the essential fatty acids and amino acids required by the human body… (stop over-fishing).
It is an excellent option for vegetarians.
It’s quite high in some essential amino acids, including gamma linoleic acid (GLA), a very rare nutrient also found in mother’s milk.
Fishermen sprinkle hempseed on the water as an effective bait..
Songbirds will pick it out of the mix as they prefer it over other seeds.
Hemp is becoming a common ingredient in lotions and many other skin, hair, and cosmetic products.. (compared to toxic chemicals).
Hemp is an ideal material for making paper. It regenerates in the field in months (unlike trees which can take 30 years or more to become harvestable after planting.)…
It makes a fine quality paper that is naturally acid free and does not become yellow and brittle or disintegrate over time like conventional paper.
Hemp is also excellent for making rugs and other textiles. Levi Strauss’ original denim jeans were made of hemp.
Hemp is the traditional rope making fibre due to its flexibility, strength, and resistance to water damage..
Hemp oil can be used to create biofuels to replace gasoline for diesel engines. Unlike fossil fuels, biofuels are renewable and produce less of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. Diesel built his original engine to run on hemp oil.
Alternatives to plastic can be made from hemp… Hemp based materials can replace wood and other materials used to build homes and other structures including foundations, walls, shingles, paneling, pipes, and paint.
Hemp may look like marijuana, however it does not contain the active chemicals that cause mind-altering effects. Politics have kept this gift from us. When Dupont made nylon, it influence was used to suppress hemp production….
“58,000 tons of hemp seeds were imported into America for paint products in 1935″ — Sherman Williams Paint Co.
Hemp produces the same amount of oxygen while it’s growing that it would use in carbon dioxide if burned as a fuel. Also, due to it’s leaf/root ratio (this can often be 10% roots vs 30% leaves), hemp can produce between 20% – 40% more oxygen than will be polluted.
Thomas Jefferson himself said, “Hemp is of first necessity to the wealth and protection of the country.”
The draft of the Declaration of Independence was made on hemp paper….
The first American Flag was made of hemp.
If hemp cross-pollinates with marijuana, it creates a lower THC marijuana, not a smokable hemp… Illegal growers will not grow near hemp farms because it practically destroys the effectiveness and marketability of their product.
Fabrics made of at least one-half hemp block the sun’s UV rays more effectively than other fabrics..
The US Drug Enforcement Agency classifies all C. sativa (hemp) varieties as “marijuana.” Hemp was grown commercially (with increasing governmental interference) in the United States until the 1950s. It was doomed by the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937, which placed an extremely high tax on marijuana and made it effectively impossible to grow industrial hemp…
While Congress expressly expected the continued production of industrial hemp, the Federal Bureau of Narcotics lumped industrial hemp with marijuana…
Because of its low lignin content, hemp can be pulped using less chemicals than with wood…
It is naturally resistant to most pests, precluding the need for pesticides. It grows tightly spaced, out-competing any weeds, so herbicides are not necessary. It also leaves a weed-free field for a following crop…
Today it is clear that these beginnings of “the war on drugs” were pushed into being by the newspaper, cotton, and petroleum industries, all of which had much to fear over being competitive with hemp…..
Finally, a word of wisdom from our founding father…. “Make the most you can of the Indian Hemp seed and sow it everywhere.” — George Washington 1794
Why does every bill with Scott’s and Sokola’s name at the top, mean no good for the people of Delaware? Intriguing, however, also are the names of Kowalko, Baumbach, and Townsend as additional sponsors for this same bill… ( Longhurst is there as well, but that doesn’t matter)….. One must assume for these three to endorse such a bill, that perhaps they are unaware of who is signed up as a lobbyist, and who, if a fee is required, will be shut out from personally making their case to Delaware legislators..
Contrary to I guess, public opinion, not all lobbyists are fat cats. Many of them are thin cats….
Nancy Willing is one. Darlene Battle is another. John Flaherty is a third. For you see, if anyone approaches a legislator about a certain bill, they need to be signed in as a lobbyist….
All a lobbyist is, is an expert on piece of legislation who attempts to explain it to a legislator. Of course, an expert on sneaking a poisonous chemical through the labyrinth of law, requires one kind of lobbyist. But removing the” box” from employment applications, requires another….. Whereas our legislature doesn’t need the first type of lobbyists, it absolutely really does need the second.
What this bill does, is shut accessibility to legislators to all who cannot pay. The indigent, the middle class, the workers, don’t have a voice, unless they can find a paid lobbyist who will do it pro-bono. The ducks, geese, and even the gray fox who currently have school children as advocates, get shut out allowing sportsman to dominate the conversation. In gun control, the dead children have no voice; the paying NRA has a monopoly on legislative personal relationships….
That is why as it stands, this is a bad bill.
To those on the inside, the reason for it’s proposal is obvious in light of the education fight over Common Core. Educational issues are not going as those responsible (Jack Markell) for pushing them through legislature think they should. Somehow, legislators are getting other opinions beside those carefully screened for their indulgence… This bill will stop that.
I can understand how progressives could get behind a bill to make lobbyists report who pays them, and make lobbyists pay a fee…. But a close reading of the bill does not legislate how much the fee shall be, nor does it exempt anyone working pro-bono… Yes, of course without it being specified specifically, that could still happen after this bill is passed. … But so could the opposite!… It will be solely at the discretion of those on the Integrity Commission to determine who can play, and who cannot….
“Set that fee for Nancy at a $1000, will you” said the joker to the thief……
Below are organizations currently listed as lobbyists who probably won’t be, if the fee is enacted……
- Delaware Estuary
- Stand Up For What’s Right And Just
- National Popular Vote
- Girl Scouts of Chesapeake Bay
- Associated Community Talents
- Delaware Association of Non Profit Agencies
- 9-12 Delaware Patriots
- Kent County Progressives
- Center for Inland Bays
- Delawareans for Social and Economic Justice
- Delawind
- Delaware Repeal Project
- Delaware Jobs Now
- American Lung Association
- Common Cause/ Delaware
- Pilot’s Association for the Delaware River
- Burris Firm
- NAACP
- Concerned Black Men, Inc.
- Wilmington Tug
- Blue Hen, Inc.
- Delaware Business Roundtable Education Committee
- Delaware ACLU
- Center for Popular Democracy
- Council on State Taxation
- Marijuana Policy Project
- Delaware Audubon Society
- Delaware Sleep Society
- American Traffic Solutions
- League of Women Voters
- Chimes Delaware
- PTA Delaware Congress
- Delaware Rural Water Association
- Brandywine Sprouts, Roots, and Shoots
- Delaware Council on Gambling Problems
- Autism Delaware
- Delaware Auctioneer Association
- Delaware Police Chief’s Council
- Save our Society From Drugs
- Greenwatch Institute
- Sierra Club
- Delaware Defensive Driving
- March of Dimes
- Consortium of Non-medical Privately Owned Healthcare
- City of Wilmington
- Volunteer Hose Company of Middletown
- Delaware Volunteer Fireman’s Association
- Delaware Coalition For Open Government
- Delaware School Boards Association
- Consumer’s Union of US Inc.
- AIDS Delaware
- Delaware Nature Society
- Delaware River Stevedores, Inc
- Council on State Taxation
- Bridgeville Rifle and Pistol Club
- Delaware Ecumenical Council on Children and Families
- American Lung Association of the Mid Atlantic
- Delaware Society for Respiratory Care
- Humane Society of the United States
- Horizon House
- American Cancer Society Action Network and It’s Affiliates
- Consumer Health Products Association
- Best Friends
- Wilmington Fire Foundation
- Film Delaware
- Delaware Compensation Rating Bureau
- Easter Seals
- Rodel
- Mid Atlantic Education Alliance
- Christina River, LLC
- Delaware Breast Cancer Coalition
- Recycling Reinvented
- Delaware State Lodge FOP
- Police Athletic League of Delaware
- Kind to Kids Foundation
- Delaware State Funeral Directors Association
- Delaware Tourism Alliance
- Commercial Industrial Reality Council
- Cigar Association of America
- Scientific Games Corporation
- Delaware Auctioneer Association
- Save our Delaware Byways
- Delaware Solar Energy Coalition
- Fort Miles Historical Association
- Atlantic Pawn
- Delaware Asian American Business Association
- City of Newark
- Alternative Energy Researching and Consultation
- Gift of Life Donor Program
- Delaware Cemetaries for Consumer Choice
- Gun Rights Across America
- White Clay Creek Watershed Management Association
- Rehoboth Art League
- WHYY Inc
- Delaware Association of Surveyors
- National Campaign to Reform State Juvenile Judicial System
- Sussex Technical School District
- National Guard Association of Delaware
- OSG Ship Management Inc.
- St. Francis Hospital/Catholic Health East
- Westown Movie Theater
- Red Frog, Events LLC
- Woodlawn Trustees
- Prestige Academy
- Communities in Schools of Delaware
- Punkin’ Chunkin’
- CRI
- Arcadia Wind Power
- National Association of Professional Surplus Lines Offices LLC
- Teach For America
- Civic League for New Castle County
Just to name a few… You see, lobbyists are the oil inside the engine. They reduce friction, and are what keep legislators capable of staying ahead of multiple issues at any given time…. So, yes, some may be paid very well. But quite a few of the above will not be back if this law is passed and signed….
I have included lobbyists for both sides, to show that they are indispensible to the operation of government as we know it… This bill will affect the postions held dear by both Republicans and Democrats. Essentially those hurt will be all those who cannot afford to pay for representation … Those helped will be all those who can easily pay for the privilege of meeting with a legislator….
That is why I am not surprised to see Sokola and Scott at the top of this bill. I am surprised to see Townsend, Kowalko, and Baumbach as additional sponsors…. Someone should tell them…..
And here is the meat of the bill…..
====
Section 1. Amend § 5832, Title 29 of the Delaware Code by making insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 5832. Registration of lobbyists with the State Public Integrity Commission.
(b) The information recorded in the Commission’s lobbyist docket shall include for each separate employer:
(6) Whether the employer pays or promises to pay compensation, as defined in § 5831(a) of this title, to the lobbyist. The amount or value of compensation is not required.
(e) Upon registration, and between January 1st and January 15th of each subsequent year, each lobbyist shall pay an annual registration fee per employer paying or promising compensation to the lobbyist. The fee is not prorated for compensated lobbyists or their employers who are registered for only a portion of the year. At the beginning of each calendar year, the Commission shall establish an annual registration fee which shall approximate and reasonably reflect all costs necessary to defray the expenses of administering § 5832, § 5833, § 5834, § 5835, § 5836, § 5837, § 5838 of this title. The Commission may not impose a fee on lobbyists who are not paid, or who are not promised, compensation from the employer of the lobbyist. The fee is payable through the Public Integrity Reporting System database maintained by the Commission. All revenue generated by registration fees shall be deposited in an appropriated special fund account for the Commission. These funds shall be used to fund all costs necessary to defray the expenses of administration of § 5832, § 5833, § 5834, § 5835, § 5836, § 5837, § 5838 of this title. Nothing in this section shall relieve a lobbyist from the registration requirement in subsection (a) of this title, whether required to pay the annual fee or not.
Section 2. Amend § 5838, Title 29 of the Delaware Code by making insertions as shown by underline as follows and by redesignating accordingly:
§ 5838. Violations and penalties.
(d) Any person who fails to pay a registration fee required by this subchapter shall be deemed to have voluntarily cancelled registration as a lobbyist and shall be prohibited from reregistering or acting as a lobbyist until all delinquent registration fees are paid.
Section 3. This Act shall become effective on January 1, 2015.
This kind…
Doesn’t he have an election coming up soon? If so, how can anyone expect to make a credible run for Attorney General IN THIS STATE, AFTER BEAU BIDEN’S TERM, and be guilty of keeping a tiny little bill, which has no harm but opens all board meetings to being recorded and accessible on line?
Only Simon Barsinister could be against something so inane… Or…. Hmmmmm…. Somebody … With… Something…. To …. Hide….
Hmmm. Now… Why would the surprise future attorney general, be sooooo adamant, even to the point of losing an election over blocking legislation so inane, that all it does is open school boards of all things, open to the public as a service… Anyone can walk into a school board and hear exactly the same thing they’d hear on tape… But sometimes… a diaper needs changed. But sometimes, a family meal needs prepared. Sometimes extra work for the office must be done for deadline the next day…. Darn we say now….I guess we won’t get to know what happened…
So why? Why is HB 23 being put on ice as my compatriot Kilroy is found of saying. Who is soooooo scared someone will find out what is really going on in school board meetings? Is it Charlie Copeland? Is it Mark Murphy? Is it… Darryl Scott? Is it Pete Schwartzkoph?
Hmmm. I wonder if it has any sponsors in the General Assembly right now?
HOLY MOLY!!!!!! LOOK AT THIS!!! Sponsors: Hudson, Sen. Peterson, Reps. Dukes, D. Short, Miro, Peterman, Wilson, Baumbach, Bennett, Mitchell, K. Williams; Sens. Hocker, Lavelle, Simpson, Townsend….
Is Pete Schwartzkoph there?….. No…… Is Bryon Short there? ….. No…… Is Melanie George Smith there?….. No…… Is Valarie Longhurst there?……. No…… Is Darryl Scott there? … No….Is Earl Jacques there?…… No Is Patty Blevins there? …… No…… Is Quentin Johnson there? …. No…. is John Viola there?…… No…. Is Ernie Lopez there?….. No?
Hmmmmmm… What do those all have in common…… 🙂 Hmmmmmmmmmmmm…. Do they all drink their coconut milk imbibed with lime? …. No….. Do they all call each other up and wear the same color of underwear each daily session?…… No…… Ummm. Do they all have the same Delaware extension tatoo’d to their buttocks?….. Ummmm…..M a y… b e…….
It is someone with a lot to hide; that is for sure… And it is nobody from here:
Red Clay, Christina, Capital, Delmar, Brandywine and Colonial currently already voluntarily record their board meetings! As well as the Delaware State Board of Education records their meetings!
So why is this something that has to be kept secret, and never brought to pass?….. Because we are not talking about individuals VOTING on a bill…They could vote YEA or NEA and it wouldn’t matter! What concerns us and you, is the pure morality of KEEPING A BILL FROM BEING VOTED FOR YOU BECAUSE IT WILL PASS….
So according to its sponsor, Deborah Hudson, Matt Denn is sitting on this bill…. He is doing it to protect someone else, to whom perhaps he is loyal…. How seriously then, were a procedural crime to be committed requiring a judicial investigation, can he be trusted to dig and search for the truth instead of whitewashing the whole affair to protect this same someone, when he can’t even be trusted to get a vote for heaven’s sakes….on a voice recording of school board meetings, out on to the floor for a vote? Let that sink in for a second…. Really?
Put all else aside….. Really?
IS that really the kind of attorney general we want after Beau Biden…. a crony?
Really? He’s going to throw his whole career away …. on that?
Really? Why would he do that? But it is definite a campaign issue, like blocking the GW bridge, one that resonates and will stick, because EVERY parent has a child in school….Whether they would ever listen themselves or not, this concerns them now… They too will question: why is Matt Denn, who is running for Attorney General, trying so hard to keep information regarding my kid and his friends, from ever being made public??? Hmmmmm….
Seriously, this blemishes his entire pro-family image he developed while serving as our insurance commissioner. This makes him one of the snakes….. with those evil eyes…..
Common Core is based on one single paper written in 2010, which artificially inflated a crises that our high school graduates were not sufficiently prepared for college… Back then I believed it, as do most people who like me never thought to question a supposedly intellectual study we thought was thoroughly based on data.
Turns out we were wrong to trust it. If you bear with me, I hope to use hard data we now have from 2009, to cast a giant shadow of doubt on this paper that in 2010, led all of America down the path to corporatizing education to the detriment of students, parents, and teachers. Hopefully this data in turn, will lead to the detriment of all those politicians who took us there, and jumped on board of Common Core without ever asking if the data was real…..
First from the paper itself…. This assertion…. then a follow up with statistics on post-secondary education….
“Figure 1 shows the extent of the college readiness problem by portraying the gap between eligibility for college and readiness to do college-level work. Students in public colleges and universities attend one of three types of postsecondary institutions: highly selective four-year institutions, somewhat selective four-year institutions, and nonselective or open-access two-year colleges.The readiness gap is nominal in the most selective universities because their admissions criteria screen out most students who are under-prepared.The gap is huge, however, in the other two sectors of higher education, which serve between 80 percent and 90 percent of undergraduates in public institutions.”
We can begin to see the fallacy of the argument. We are not discussing students going into Harvard who are ill prepared. Nor Ohio State. Nor any of the higher education facilities we have come to think of under the designation of “college”… What this study attempts to argue, is that those who previously would never have thought of going on past high school graduation, are now doing so, and are finding that they didn’t pay attention in high school as well as they should have….. probably because back then, they never expected to go to college…
As this study shows, it is those on the bottom who are the ones not prepared… In other words, our entire educational system was putt-putt-putting along fine. We are just attempting to increase what is taught among those of the bottom academic margins….
Although such a cause may be deemed progressive and creating an overall improvement to society, … why, then, are we changing the entire educational process across this nation from the top down, in trying to bring the bottom level up, serving only to water down the top?
The answer is $$$. Someone is making a boatload of money off this claim. Whereas instead of recognizing there is nothing wrong with the status quo, that if an underprivileged or “regular joe” wants to go to college and better his lot in life, he can do so (and while there take and pass the redial courses he needs), … the sales pitch was made and gobbled up that we needed a half a billion Federal dollars invested into two companies in order to change the entire curriculum of America’s schools, including those of students at the top who seem to have no problem when THEY go into post secondary education….
On to the data. I apologize for it being heavy in numbers, but as a firm believer in open source arguments, I certainly wouldn’t think of having it any other way.
The source for the statistics is the NCES or National Center of Educational Statistics or nces.ed.gov …. From this source we see that each year across America, we graduate 3,011,040. Roughly 3 million every year…
Now since today’s post secondary educational system is fragmented beyond recognition, with statistics inclusive of doctorates, masters, bachelors, associates, and trade schools… and then we have to process how many have years off, take partial loads, are on the 5 year plan, the 6 year plan, etc… in order just to get a conservative estimate I picked the number of graduations or degrees handed out, which are markable. If 3 million exit the high schools each year then an estimate of the number graduating would give us at least a minimal floor on how well this data stacks up…
From the NCES we see that roughly 21 million were enrolled 2009-2010. That includes everyone… Of that, 13 million were enrolled in 4 year institutions, 7.5 million were in 2 year institutions, and under half a million in less than two year institutions.
Further down the chart we find the number of those receiving degrees. This is what we have to match up to the flood of students leaving high school, or 3 million each year….
We see 937,000 of what used to be considered Junk degrees… Very necessary for technical skills, such as ultrasound technology, so I certainly don’t want to make light of them, but they run less than two years of education and don’t really study typical college course such as calculus or the religous beliefs of American Samoans. Then there are 850,000 associates degrees, with 250,000 given out by 4 years colleges, and 600,000 given out by 2 year accredited community colleges.
Bachelor degrees make up 1,650,000…. (Masters an additional 700,000 and Doctor’s degrees at 150,000, neither included in the below undergraduate total).
So we feed 3 million into the post-secondary pipeline, and give undergraduate degrees out to 3.4 million.
This convolution is explained by the growth of students applying to college. Enrollment in degree-granting institutions increased by 11 percent between 1990 and 2000. Between 2000 and 2010, enrollment increased 37 percent, from 15.3 million to 21.0 million. Much of the growth between 2000 and 2010 was in full-time enrollment; the number of full-time students rose 45 percent, while the number of part-time students rose 26 percent.. So in 2009-10, one was conferring 4-year degrees upon someone who entered 2005, and 3 year 2-years degrees upon someone who entered in 2006. upon 2-years completing on time who entered in 2007, and those who took one year trade school courses from 2008… Likewise if the amount going into post secondary education was collapsing, the reverse, less graduating than entering would be true…..
These totals do not include those graduating who did either armed forces,or went straight into the workforce, or remained unemployed… The percentage of 18-24 year olds going to college rose from 35% up to 41%. Which means that 60% or 1.8 million of each graduating wave of 3 million, does not go to college at all…
Additionally some relieved of their jobs in 2009, went back to school for various degrees helping in part to bump up the one year statistics, and probably later will be a bigger force in pumping up the future 2 years and 4 years statistics.
So putting the charts together we would estimate that overall, out of a wave of high school graduates 40% of the 3 million or 1.2 million go onward into post secondary education. Of this 1.2 million the assumption made by the Common Core advocate group was that 60% of those 1.2 million or 720, 000 went to schools only accepting a high school diploma in order to allow one entrance. Of those, 75% of that 720,000 needed remedial math or English. That comes to 540,000…
In the next echelon of 30% of attending less selective four year institutions, (read state colleges mandated to allow all eligible state students), we see from the report that they estimated 50% of those were not at the level to jump into the academic fray. That total number 180,000. Finally in the most selective colleges taking 10% of those 1.2 million of each class going into school after graduation, only 10% or 12,000 are deemed not up to standards…. When added up, 12,000 + 180,000 + 540,000 we see that a total of 732,000 students may need some remedial math or English which are given without receiving college credit…..
The percentage of those in post secondary education based on these estimates, requiring remedial instruction (732,000 out of 1.2 million) is 61%….
But the percentage out of all high school graduates (3 million) is 24.4%…. We essentially are creating a curriculum to benefit only 24.4% of our students. (For this we are spending most of a child’s time in kindergarten teaching how to properly fill bubbles on a standardized test….)
Now, there is another side to this equation….
Here are the schools ranked by largest enrollment by the current Wikipedia
1 University of Phoenix For-Profit 4-year Online Campus (Headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona) 307,871
2 Pennsylvania State University Public 4-year Multiple Campuses (Headquartered in University Park, Pennsylvania) 96,562
3 Ashford University For-Profit 4-year Multiple Campuses (Headquarters in Clinton, Iowa) 74,596
4 Arizona State University Public 4-year Phoenix Metropolitan Area, Arizona 72,254
5 University of Minnesota Public 4-year Multiple Campuses (Headquarters in Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota) 68,418
6 Liberty University Private 4-year Lynchburg, VA 64,096
7 Miami Dade College Public 2-year Miami, Florida 63,736
8 Lone Star College System Public 2-year The Woodlands, Texas 63,029
9 Houston Community College Public 2-year Houston, Texas 63,015
10 University of Central Florida Public 4-year Orlando, Florida 58,465
11 Ohio State University Public 4-year Columbus, Ohio 56,867
12 Kaplan University For-Profit 4-year Multiple Campuses (Headquarters in Davenport, Iowa) 56,606
13 University of Texas at Austin Public 4-year Austin, TX 51,112
14 American Public University System For-Profit 4-year Online (Headquarters Charles Town, WV) 50,838
15 University of Texas A&M Public 4-year College Station, TX 50,230
16 Tarrant County College District Public 2-year Fort Worth, Texas 50,062
17 Northern Virginia Community College Public 2-year Annandale, Virginia 50,044
18 University of Florida Public 4-year Gainesville, Florida 49,589
19 Walden University For-Profit 4-year Online Campus (Headquartered in Minneapolis, MN) 48,982
20 Michigan State University Public 4-year East Lansing, Michigan 47,825
Just add up the total enrollment of the “for profit” universities listed above….. That total is 482,287. Next take the 2 year community college enrollments. 289,886…
First, without being condescending, we should be grateful that this many people now are able to get further schooling who could not get it before… Adding these two enrollments together, one comes with 772,173. These figures consist of total enrollments and should not be confused with those partial enrollments entering on a year by year basis.
It should also be noted; that whereas the requirements may be easier to get into a for-profit or a community college, the course material is usually taught on par with those of long term colleges and universities. Therefore though easier to get in, they are not that easy to pass and get out anymore than a state university or college would be…
So it would stand to appear reasonable that those entering these colleges would have a lower echelon of preparedness than would those doing well in high school, and common sense would preclude they would need some remedial work to compete on the level of those who ranked in the tops of their high school classes.
Is that reason enough to dismantle public education as we know it, throw the old textbooks out of the window, and re do everything just for this percentage of students?
Common Core will not teach great works of literature. Common Core stops math development at Algebra II. (no geometry, no trig, no pre-calc, no calc. ) Is this good for those 40% who do not need remedial work when they go forward? Are we hurting them by not educating them enough, when their brains are perfect for retaining it? By limiting our top performers, are we truly dumbing down America?
Now I was playing you along here to see if you caught the catch. For this to be true, those 10,30, 60 percents and those 75, 50, and 10% all have to be true assessments… These were the premise made by the writers of Common Core….
In their report, there is this line….
Firm data on the proportions of entering college students who need remediation in English
and/or math are not available, but the proportions shown in Figure 1 reflect national estimates. 1
I left the citation number… Clicking forward to the citation, it reads like this…..
1 Readiness standards vary widely across states and across institutions within states, which further clouds the meaning of national statistics on remedial rates.
The report glibly slides past this. It cites CSU’s entry exam as it’s only source. It extrapolates the national totals from CSU’s data. California State University has 23 campuses across California. It has required entrance standards for each incoming freshmen class. The reports states….
68 percent of the 50,000 entering freshmen at CSU campuses require remediation in English/language arts, math, or both…
Wow, can it really be that bad? In one word …. no. If one goes to CSU and I pulled 2009 to see how it compares with the NCES data above, CSU states that it deemed 33% were not proficient in math. Not 68%. Dropping down the page to the English comparison, and the statewide comparisons are to the right of every California High School’s data, CSU states that it deemed 34% not proficient in English… not 68%… So where did the 68% come from……
WELL… if you take 33% and add 34%…. you get 67%…. and then add the decimals together, you get a few points over 68%……
Really. REALLY? I mean REALLY? ….. We are changing the entire curriculum of the United States of America, (its no mistake: Common Core is changing the curriculum of America) on one single report written by someone who does not know you can’t add percentages in a sum? Really?
Did anyones ever stop to consider that if 66% of students ARE proficient in English, and 67% of students ARE proficient in Math….. how do you make the jump that 68% of incoming freshmen are not proficient in math or english or both? Yes…. You added them together…. (hope you weren’t drinking liquids when you read this)..
And that, is what sold the Governor’s Association on implementing Common Core, and doing so,… completely out of the public eye. Otherwise someone might actually crunch the numbers….
So now let us redo the national numbers with this new data, correctly reported by CSU with 33% imputed instead of 68%…. Here is where I’ll use others to collaborate. …. But working off page with the same formula and NCES data above…. I come up with a gap of 362,480 post secondary students entering unprepared… these are the ones who are not proficient…. Among the 1.2 million entering post secondary schools each year, that ranks at…. 30.2%..
Which means we are changing the curriculum of our schools to somewhat sketchily benefit just 12% of our entire graduating class of the total 3 million students a year…. And to help this 12%, which in numbers is almost the equivalent of the University of Phoenix’s enrollment, we are ruining the minds of the other 88%…..
For 12% (who would be considered lower C students….)
- We are making kindergartners take bubble tests.
- We are training elementary students how to use computers so they can take on line tests
- We are eliminating great literature out of the curriculum.
- We are not teaching math beyond Algebra.
- We are cutting back on art, music, and foreign languages, because they aren’t tested.
- We are boring our students into apathy…..
- We failed over 70% of New York’s students!
Why? How did this come about?
Apparently someone didn’t know you couldn’t add percents together and get a bigger sum……
it is always nice to say “I told you so” even when it irritates those listening to have to hear it. I apologize in advance for this is one of these moment. But the first story I saw today, was one that i went on a limb to state and took flack for. It has now come to pass.
in what now seems like a previous lifetime, when there actually were Conservatives on the blog circuit, I stated that teeming up with the Chinese was our solution to stabalizing and getting out of Iraq. I made the point that we’d lost the right to develop all of Iraq’s oil and would never get it being the oppressor; we should use a third party as a front, and partner with them to at least get some access.
The oil barons all cried traitor…
Lol. Well, today Reuters broke the story that Exxon was partnering with PetroChina to develop one of the massive oil fields near Basra. As an aside to that story, it mentions that one of Iraq’s targets is to be outproducing Saudi Arabia by 2020.
it is always nice to always be right. 🙂 But just imagine if we’d done it back in 2007.
A) The establishment of a Charter Performance Fund, starting at $2 million; I’ll raise you to 5.
B) Charter Schools are a form of re-segregation.
C) The DOE can transfer funds from public to charter schools. If that were such a good practice, then they should also be able to transfer funds from Charters back into public funds. That they cannot do.
D) A charter contract for ten years is way too long. The decisions made today, cannot be changed for bad or worse, until 2023 if this is the case…
Therefore this is a super bad bill and should be scrapped (paraphrased…:) )
Frequently quoted in support of scrapping our current teaching standards, and replacing them with an untested approach, has been the works of one Dr. Louise Moats, a developer for Sopris Learning, a private company that makes money getting schools systems like Delaware’s, to buy its products.
Louise Moat’s writings were predominantly based off an NRP study, yet Dr. Moats appears unfamiliar with the actual findings of the NRP and with the subsequent re-analyses of the studies they examined…
NRP adjusted its earlier enthusiasm and found only a small positive effect for systematic phonics instruction, one that even if it were reliable is, of no practical significance in terms of improving reading achievement.
Yet despite being disproven, today’s educational reformers such as Pat Heffernan’s piece in the News Journal use this as proof that today’s teachers are dumb and don’t know the newest research which teaches reading.
Old educational pros laugh at him because the same controversy swirled in the 70’s.
For this reason we have to change everything!
With SB 51 we are trading the educational excellence of the 31st best educational American school of teacher education, ranked as the University of Delaware was, for a philosophy that has been long discredited…. except by the sellers of programs they promote.
The real question is why? And How… could this happen? How could the everyone be fooled by a false study? How could we scrap the 31st best teaching institution in the top nation for teaching excellence, for an advertisement? How could this get passed without debate?