Yesterday, the first day of the Republican Congress, a bill was rushed through the House and passed:  requiring the Congressional Budget Office to use dynamic scoring when figuring out future budgets…

Republicans have been saying lower taxes cause the economy to grow and that growth generates more revenue. They’ve said that for years… We’ve tried it for the past 15 but things got worse for all of us, instead of better…

Last couple of years, under Paul Ryan (that little whiz-boy from Wisconsin), they tried writing budgets for their first time and found, that everything they have been saying, was indeed wrong…  The math would not work out…

The reason the math would not work out, is because of a simple fact that when you don’t pay your bills and instead splurge and waste that bill-money, at some future point there will be a reckoning.   Like if you choose spend your mortgage, electricity bill, water bill, gas bill money on big-ticket orgies, there comes a point where you are left dry, cold, in the dark, and have no domicile.

This is terrible they said… What can we do… ..

The answer obvious to any 5 year old, is to pretend.    We can pretend that we will get tons of money later and pay our debts off then…

So we convince ourselves that IF we spend \$10,000 over budget, we will soon be making \$100,000 more so we can pay it back then.  IF we get a \$10,000 raise every year, then next year we just run the same as this, and have \$10,000 extra dollars with which to pay it back.

Now this does work if you are indeed guaranteed to get \$10,000 increases every year… What dynamic scoring does is make the assumption we will set-in-stone increases to our salary by \$10,000 every year for ten years straight.  So your yearly income will climb like this:

• Base rate:  \$40,000 per year
• After Year One:  \$50,000 per year
• After Year Two   \$60,000 per year
• After Year Three  \$70,000 per year
• After Year Four   \$ 80,000 per year
• After Year Five   \$90,000 per year
• After Year Six   \$100,000 per year
• After Year Seven \$110,000 per year
• After Year Eight \$120,000 per year
• After Year Nine \$130,000 per year
• After Year Ten:  \$140,000 per year

Then what they do is add all these together and come up with an argument like this…  We can easily afford this orgy and hire Taylor Swift to sing for it because look, over ten years we are going to earn \$990,000 so we can easily pay back the \$10,000 we blow on ourselves right now… ( Now if you’ve been a Republican shut out from parties for a long while, not being invited to do the bump with Jerry Jones) just hearing this may make you decide to jump in, no clothes and all.

====

But here is reality… You probably are not going to get a \$10,000 (25%) raise… Let us look at this logically.. How long have you been working?  How many \$10,000 raises have you ever gotten before?  Did any of your costs also rise with that raise, so you really didn’t have all that money to spend?  Across history, was there ever a time when \$10,000 raises per year were the norm?  If not, why would they suddenly start now?

So what usually happens in households that pursue false dreams, is that if they do not tie expenses to actual income, they usually come up short and that shorted gap grows bigger and bigger.

Here is what to expect in reality… The first year we spend \$10,000 over what we make.  It is either loaned to us, or we simply just skip paying our bills for one year… The next year we not only again spend \$10,000 more than we make, but we still make the same \$40,000… So that year on our \$40,000 income we owe \$10,000 from year one, and \$10,000 from year two. We can’t live on just \$20,000 in order to pay it all back… So, assuming we will get much more income the following year, we stretch the loan a little further…  But again, no raise comes that year.

Where we pretended that we would be making \$60,000 by that year (year 3) {and over the three year span would have accumulated \$150,000 (40,000 + 50,000 + 60,000), enabling us to pay back three years (\$30,000) of \$10,000 overdrafts having \$120,000 left over}… Instead due to a lack of “pretended raise” amounts,  we only got \$120,000 over those three years, and borrowed \$10,000 each year, so our net balance is \$90, 000, which as you see divided by 3, equals \$30,000 per year, whereas our regular living expenses continued at the original \$40,000 per year.Yet we live like we are making \$50,000, \$60,000, \$70,000 each subsequent year due to our over-extended loans….

This is dynamic scoring…. It should be illegal, and until yesterday, it was.

It is possible, it can work if the assumptions work out… So one must look at the assumptions very carefully to see if they are realistic… Dynamic scoring has only one reason for existence.  To convince people who don’t want to spend that hard earned money of theirs on a risky venture, to go ahead and spend it on that risky venture by consoling them it will be painless when looked back upon from the future.

And the” risky venture” this time, is again take the bulk of your money and hand it over to the top one percent, giving them even more power over you… If you do that these people say, money will just grow for them and everyone will be rich…. give them your money; give it to them now.

Alas we’ve tried that already… We didn’t get rich. For it, we got a very deep recession, We got the 1% owning more than ever; the 99% owning less. We got 80% of our population living day to day, week to week, just a little above subsistence…  We went backward.  Now with this Congress we are about to have a new battle of inequality on a level unseen in America, And this time: it will all take place up within the top 1%… Who among them will win the final championship monopoly game?.. Who will lose?… It matters little to most of us, Most of us were eliminated long time ago.

But first, for all of this to occur, they first have to change the way we do math itself in order to justify it, because it doesn’t work out their way using real numbers.  And that, my friends,… is what was done yesterday.