It’s from a video spoof called Sheik Fil A….. Delaware Liberal introduced to us a week and a half ago.
A lot of people, especially men have trouble dealing with anal penetration of the buttocks, especially when that anus belongs to another man.
For that reason, their squeamishness causes them to be against da gays. Those most adamant against this act usually come from areas where if that act is done, it is not done in love, but is instead used as a brutal weapon. Bluntly put, it is used in rural America, Arab nations, and areas of the inner city, as rape, … a crime of violence and not mutual respect.
Therefore those from areas where this constantly occurs ( a more violent version of Mitt Romney pinning a boy down and cutting his hair,) tend to be consistently against that act. Ironically, most often none tend to see anything wrong when that practice occurs between heterosexual couples. It is safe. It is harmless. It is exploratory, and it is consensual. Most often, those who are violently against da gays, see nothing wrong with two old ladies living together. They never venture to wonder what goes on in that old house. But they have no problem with them being roomies. Likewise they see old men living together as acceptable. They are old. Surely nothing goes on inside that old house…
Because of the horrible trauma that they have endured, they fail to see that marriage equality is about love… nothing more. People don’t stay together for years just to get off. They stay because that person is who they want to spend their time with. Every day they face a question? Do I want to go to a club and hook up, or do I want to go home to my best friend, and every day they choose to go home to their best friend.
To be fair the same choice exists for hetero-sexual couples. Should I take this easy lay being offered at work, or should I go home to my life-partner… It appears now that 50% of us choose to go home to our spouses. The other 50% take the easy lay. Based on divorce figures that is…
The more you look at it, the more two gays in a relationship appear better if not as good, as a man and a wife in a relationship. It certainly isn’t about sex in a hetero sexual marriage. Those of you who have been married forty years…. how often do you have sex now? How about thirty? Twenty? Sadly there are an awful lot of people out there not having sex these days… despite the invention of viagra…
So why is it “only” about sex in a single sex couple? It isn’t. It is about finding someone you love, and choosing to last long enough together to see what that love will grow…..
So if you are against single sex marriage, you are against love. And in the words of our Lord and Saviour, being against love, is not where you want your heart to be when you pass over to the other side…
So what do you do about Chik Fil A appreciation day. Their chicken is soooo good, like butter… butter it is.. It is the only thing worth waiting for in a Drive Thru line… So how does one balance ones innate desire to support something soo good you can’t do without, versus someone else’s problem with someone expressing their freedom of speech…..
What if instead of gays, Chik Fil A was busting on Christians?.. What if they were busting on Muslims? What if they were busting on Catholics? What if they were busting on Jews? What if they were busting on wet backs? What if they were busting on Spics? What if they were busting on Pollacks? What if they were busting on Talley’s? What if they were busting on Indians? What if they were busting on Mexicans? What if instead of gays, we were in the deep south of the 60’s, and they were busting on blacks, saying blacks shouldn’t get married; saying blacks can’t vote; saying blacks can’t go to restrooms with whites; saying blacks have to sit on the back of the bus; saying blacks can’t sit at the part of the counter that plainly says…. “white’s only”? Would you be one of those southerners laughing it off as something them northern city-fied liberals were instigating, and damn it, someone with southern pride was gonna buy every piece of chicken that Chik Fil A put down in the grease?
If so… I hope you choke on your chicken……..
kavips 
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 31, 2012 at 9:10 am
justme
Chik Fil A has the same position on same sex marriage the Obama had for the last 30 years. Where was your outrage then?
July 31, 2012 at 11:13 am
kavips
That is a great question. Not so much for the obvious answer that there was no outrage to be outrageous over, but over the fact that is shows how we have to move forward in little bits. First acceptance that gays weren’t queer. Then military service. Then civil unions. Then openness in the military. Then gay marriage… because… really, why not?
Good thing blacks were integrated in the military as early as ’49 is all I can say…
Yay.. Harry….
July 31, 2012 at 12:14 pm
justme
What a BS answer. PS Republicans freed the slaves and fought for integration. Democrats opposed both.
July 31, 2012 at 10:23 pm
kavips
What does that have to do with anything? Except perhaps to cause everyone to wonder what horrible thing happened within the Republican party to steer the Republicans wrong completely off the road and over the cliff into a swarming ocean pounding against basalt.
August 1, 2012 at 12:04 pm
guest
Unfortunately you fail to recognize some nuances of this debate. I do not discriminate or hate “DA GAYS” but homosexuality is in its basic form a deviation from a reproductive norm. Is sex only for reproduction? No, but if in your intellectual evaluation of homosexuality were to be extended just a little, you’d have to see that it is a reproductive dead end. If they reach a point where they can identify what causes homosexuality, (i.e.: womb chromosonal exposure) then I would wager they will have parents lining up to insure their children are not homosexual. It is not that homosexuals are bad people or that they can simply “choose” to be straight. It is that the deviation is not biologically part of the human design. There is no doubt some individuals are homosexuals but is that really something to embrace, promote and foster as beneficial? If an individual is a hermaphrodyte, do they really view themselves as normal? It is not that those individuals should be treated poorly but the discussion has attempted to portray homosexuals as though they are members of a unique race. They have attempted to portray themselves as a contigent of society requiring special laws and consideration rather than trying to address AND CORRECT the medical, physiological and psychological effects of a biological deviation. Would it be reasonable to assign quotas for how many homosexuals are on a government job? In a department? On staff? I would say no it isn’t yet here you are trying to say that Chik Fil A is a gay hater. Chik Fil A may be referring more to religious teachings to justify its position but the root of it is the resistance to endorse behavior and lifestyle that is based on rather murky justifications.
I don’t care if you (or whoever) is gay, but I do care if you attempt to tell me I have to be OK with it when in my view it is a biological deviation. It is like holding up a piece of paper and I say it is paper but you demand that I call it wood pulp. You can demand it but in the end it IS paper. The demand to call it wood pulp may not necessarily be inaccurate but the demand denies that it is paper to everybody else.
Demanding a person or business recognize something they have a disagreement about is akin to holding someone down to say uncle. They may do it but you have not convinced them you’re their uncle. In fact, they probably want to call you something else instead. It doesn’t build bridges.
NO, homosexuality is NOT the same as race. It is a far different issue.
August 2, 2012 at 6:50 pm
kavips
Granted it is a dead reproductive end. But you totally fail to comprehend the emotional substance behind the whole controversy. Instead of race, which contrary to what you say is very similar in its controversy, let us turn the tables upon your beliefs…
I assume you are heterosexual and will carry that through this role play…
You are the only one in your family that is heterosexual. You are the only one in your church that is heterosexual, You are the only one in your workplace that is heterosexual. You are the only one in a restaurant that is heterosexual… When you go out, the gay guys snicker at you when you walk by their table. Often you hear silence until you are fifteen feet away and then the whole table breaks out in laughter. You constantly see eyes rolling at your expense everywhere you go. You are queer. You don’t belong in society. You have to act gay to get a job.. You have to comment on the bulge in the crotch of the same sex interviewer sent to cover your application. You have to lick your lips and look him in the eye, in order to hopefully find a source of income. You go to church, and all the gay old ladies whisper as you walk by. The gay pastor never looks at you in the eye. You are a pariah. You would be much better off dead.
If you stay out late, someone will gladly do you that favor….
Someone tries to bring up the injustice of your case. They try to find out a way to build a bridge, to get gays to understand that you are really a normal person, that you just happen to like people of the other sex, is there any crime in that.?
You know what the crowd says to that statement made in your behalf?? C’mon, I’m sure you can guess… Can’t you?
Well, I’ll help you out… They say you are a deviation from a reproductive norm. Everyone knows you make babies in test tubes now. They say if you can find out what causes heterosexuality, they will have people lining up to make their babies homosexual.. They say…. portray themselves as a contingent of society requiring special laws and consideration rather than trying to address AND CORRECT the medical, physiological and psychological effects of a biological deviation.
Because you see, …. in their world, you ARE a deviation. You ARE queer. You are an aberration, an anomaly, a ghastly freak of nature….
So… you who are so sure of yourself… Would you become gay…? Would accept that since everyone was telling you gay was normal, and you weren’t gay, that somehow or other, you also weren’t normal? So sure of yourself? If every thing including the church was supportive of gay, would you succumb and pretend to like licking the privates of the same sex, even though everything inside was telling you otherwise?
You wouldn’t? You mean to tell me that you would listen to what the inside of your body was telling you,from childhood to this very moment, that you were somehow meant to fall in love with the OPPOSITE sex, even though every institution was telling you that you were crazy? Would you seek out and find those others within your society who also somehow seemed to be weird like you, and also like members of the opposite sex?
And when the gay owner of a large chicken eatery says that: he finds it offensive if someone even attempts to tell him we all have to be OK with heterosexuality, when in his view it is a biological deviation, would you then accept it God’s truth over what your own body itself was telling you?
You wouldn’t? REALLY?
Hypocrite. ……
August 3, 2012 at 10:28 pm
anonymous
I don’t usually pay attention to this subject. I have no dog in the fight. But ‘guest’ causes one to think about what’s going on.
‘Guest’ says, “Deviation is not biologically part of the human design?” He overlooks that all people are individuals of the ‘human race.’ A ‘paper’ analogy doesn’t apply. What guest substitutes as ‘paper,’ is in fact a human being to all other human beings. Does guest suppose there aren’t trillions of ugly heterosexual encounters resulting in ‘reproductive dead ends,’ billions of married men, women in ‘non re productive encounters,’ or having sex with someone else or old men popping billions of little blue pharmaceutical pills, or married couples having sex, Ugh, when they despise each other for that matter, or having no sex at all (also ‘non re productive.’)
A child can’t take their life back to the complaint window and say, look here, I’m a kid, I don’t know what’s going on here, but you’ve setting me up for a tough life. Some nasty freak is waiting to call me a biological deviation, compare my human life to a piece of paper. Now take my life back. It might be easier, if I were dealt a straight one. No can do, next please.
So there he has it – 70-80 years of life to lead. He looks in the mirror, well, he doesn’t look too bad; he has all his parts, brains functioning well, childhood wasn’t too bad, He gets educated, employed, has interests, friends, pays a 31% tax rate, becomes a republican, starts his own business, is self sufficient, law abiding, a loved family member, a kind, thoughtful human being.
Now he faces 50-60 years of adult life. There’s a hitch. He isn’t attracted to the opposite sex. Perhaps, he could have had an easier life; he knew this was coming, but, that’s the life he was given to live..A life of no less value than any other human life. And there’s ‘guest’ right on Q, Hey you “biological deviant,” you, you, you “non biologically non human,” you, you “deviation of non reproductive norm.”
Those disgusting sounds are your voice ‘guest.’ Hear yourself.
Hundreds of millions of people are handed a multitude of human variables that “guest’ might call “deviations of human design.”
In Adolf’s imagined Utopian Germany of ‘perfect design,’ Adolf thought all people should have ‘clean’ blood – blonde hair, (not bleached) blue eyes, and be highland German, that was his ‘sexual’ preference, even though he was not very talented, was crazed, murderous, a common, dark haired Austrian. He made himself leader of ‘his race’ called Aryan. He told them to have pride in themselves, their working class status and their history. He also capitalized on their poverty, racism, hatred of people, and their need of scapegoats.
It’s sounding too familiar.
Go buy yourself a crate of mangled, deep fried chicken scraps, guest, then you can sit in a corner, cut paper dolls out of the napkins and pretend eating some greasy chicken parts, suddenly made you more than a bully of the worst sort.