I didn’t read if anyone else was following this theme I’m about to expound on, but both candidate mentioned in the title, are facing considerable controversy over their picks to their own cabinets…
I so much want to revive the old joke here, of how much easier a time Bill Lee would have had, since we already know prominent positions in his cabinet would be held by Jack Daniels, Jim Beam and Johnny Walker…. but such old jokes belong in state daily newspapers….. New and exciting jokes belong on blogs, so I will refrain at this time from even mentioning it….
But the blogs are screaming about both chief of staff picks…. Rahm Emanuel and Dennis Rochford….
We all need to calm down…
There are a couple of things to remember…
A. We elected these executives to lead.
B. We elected these executives to lead by doing something different.
C. We elected these executives to lead by doing something different so change would occur….
Both candidates are doing just that… Now I don’t know how many of you have ever put together a staff… But putting a staff together is ….. let’s stretch here… sort of like trying to get through a Thanksgiving Dinner among family that likes to argue with each other a lot….. It’s gathering a lot of individuals, each with their personal individual agenda, and getting them to subjugate their personal self aggrandizement, so that the team can accomplish its goal… Therefore above all,….one needs to be inspiring….
Second, just keeping the team together and focused on the daily running of the executive branch…requires someone with immaculate attention to detail…. The President or Governor HAS NO TIME FOR DEALING WITH DETAIL…. He needs to leave that to someone he can trust to carry it out…. And usually people who are that anal to the core…. aren’t very socially inclined, and often have legitimately over the course of their lifetimes… earned their real names of asshole, dickhead, bastard, and son of a bitch…… Duh? It’s a fact of life… The real question is whether or not these office comptrollers can hire and fire, cultivate and motivate, organize and efficiently direct members of their staff, so that the team works to make “change” happen…
Third.. The chief of staff needs to be loyal to the Executive… His job is to protect the executive at all times, so that executive has time to think, solicit advice, and make important decisions.. It requires a large amount of trust between these two people…. Direct communication, especially when it is negative, needs to flow back and forth between the two partners….There can be no breakdown in communication.
So bottom line…. if the executive himself feels most comfortable with that person he chooses…. who are we to even dare think our opinion matters? That comfort level is of prime importance.
So Executives: Pick your staffs to the best of your ability and listen not to the rumors milling around those politico’s who are bored silly now that the election is over…. If you truly want to silence them, interview some of them for a position… They will soon realize that their complaints were made in error after they understand the scope and responsibilities of the new position….
Remember, it’s change we want….As long as your staff, whoever they may be, will provide that commodity…. it will all work out….
One must remember… whether listening to WDEL, reading the News Journal, or even scrolling through blogs, that without an election, all these sources scrutinizing the picks….are scrambling for any type of controversial subject to keep and hold those patrons who swelled their ranks during the campaigns….. So in the end they will wail; it will be to no avail….
Bottom line: whether the reader lives twenty-five, fifty-five, or even seventy-five more years…. looking back they will never remember who was in the cabinet and worked to make it happen… The only thing that matters when one looks back from that perspective…is whether things got better….or worse. That…. we will remember…..
Bottom line, these controversies are just like the yearly NFL draft…. a lot of hot air over nothing……. No one is talking about it by September, and it is completely forgotten by the first Sunday in February……
Just pick good people who will win for us, and forget about what ANYONE else is saying….
Just do it.
13 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 11, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Steve Newton
It’s funny–I have never personally cared for Rahm Emmanuel, and he is a political attack dog. However, I have been doing a lot of reading lately on Presidential administrations, and have completed three major works on Nixon, Reagan, and Clinton. With different authors, different Presidents, and different ideologies, the one thing they all agree upon is that the selection of Chief of Staff is critical to the functioning of the White House, and that the worst thing a President can do is name a nice, indecisive chief of staff. For a President to be effective, the CoS has to essentially be his asshole alter ego. In that sense, it sends a signal with the Emmanuel pick that Obama understands the role of CoS much better than Clinton did in his first 2 years in office.
November 11, 2008 at 5:54 pm
George
What evidence do we have that Dennis Rochford is “good people”?
November 11, 2008 at 9:51 pm
Shirley
I kind of like Rahm Emmanuel, and don’t understand the whining. I know this kind of position, and it is no time to be a nice guy. You have to get things done. Period. This is not a popularity contest.
Sample exchange from someone wanting access to the President:
“Whine, whine, whine, whine, (INSERT ACTUAL QUESTION HERE), waaa, waaa, whine whine whine”.
CoS response: “Yes. Next question?”
LOL, I’ve been in that position many a time and sometimes you just have to cut through the egoes and the crap and do it. Feelings begone.
November 11, 2008 at 9:52 pm
Kilroy
Well now! I like your A.B.C.! My entire rant about Copeland was I felt we needed to end the political deadlock in Dover and maybe my Copeland analogy was for the crows! However, Jack Markell’s pick of Rochford shows he is ready to get down to business.
The other blogs endorsing Markell didn’t have stipulation so give the guy a break!
The big picture in Delaware is Minner (D) and Bush (R) share in the responsibility for “Delaware’s mess.” So I think both R’s and D’s need to work at the same table to clean their mess up!
George
“What evidence do we have that Dennis Rochford is “good people”?’
What evidence do you have he is not going to serve the good of the people?
November 11, 2008 at 10:24 pm
h.
Kilroy you’re such a republican.
November 11, 2008 at 10:49 pm
Kilroy
h.
“Kilroy you’re such a republican.”
You’re on crack! I voted for Markell and Obama!
November 11, 2008 at 10:50 pm
jason330
but such old jokes belong in state daily newspapers….. New and exciting jokes belong on blogs, so I will refrain at this time from even mentioning it….
Very mature of you.
November 12, 2008 at 1:30 am
Dana Garrett
I replied to you here:
http://delawarewatch.blogspot.com/2008/11/on-publics-right-to-doubt-reply-to.html
November 12, 2008 at 2:14 am
kavips
I appreciate Dana Garrett taking the time to shore up the alternative argument… I encourage all readers who believe themselves knowledgeable, to read it…
There are a couple of fallacies I believe in the process, that with additional explanation could be cleared up…
The crux of Dana’s argument it that the chief of staff should be from the same party..
The crux of my argument is that party does not matter.. competence does…
That’s about it.
November 12, 2008 at 7:46 am
anonone
One’s choice of political party reflects on one’s judgement and competence. Personally, I didn’t vote for Markell so he could put a repub in charge of the administration of his administration.
November 12, 2008 at 8:17 am
kavips
But then again, you didn’t vote Jack Markell for the sole reason that you expected him hire a Democrat as chief of staff now, did you?
More than likely, you voted to give him, instead of his opponents, the opportunity to tackle the pressing problems at hand…
All I’m saying is stop coaching from the Little League viewing stands… Just let the boy play…
If he hits home runs… he can keep playing….
November 12, 2008 at 8:54 am
Dana Garrett
“The crux of Dana’s argument it that the chief of staff should be from the same party..”
Actually, that isn’t the crux of my argument. My argument is that it is perfectly OK for people to doubt the wisdom of making someone from an opposite party the COS, that such doubts about it shouldn’t be discouraged as you did in your post by arguing that if the officeholder feels good about it, then that is all that matters.
November 12, 2008 at 9:41 am
kavips
So before I argue back, let me make sure I get the redefinition of the redefinition of what I think you said….
You are saying that for some people (most likely affiliated with the Democratic Party), they should have a right to doubt the wisdom of selecting someone from the other side as chief of staff?
If I understood you correctly, I would certainly agree…
As in this example… “Darn, I carried water for the Markell campaign, and earned the spot as chief of staff, and now, he’s giving it to a Republican?”
There is no contest… I would certainly defend the right to have such thoughts and make sure that basic right was protected by the Constitution…. That is not an issue…
I would also defend, under the same principals of individual freedom… Obama’s and Markell’s right to think differently…. They too have just as equal a right to perform as they wish, just as that other one has to complain that they are NOT doing what THAT other person wants…
The advantages of choosing someone qualified, and on good rapport with the executive, far outweigh all the chutterbutt of those longing for partisan politics of old….