A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

What the NRA is proposing: that every man become his own enforcer of his own view of   “constitutionality”  by having his own masses of whatever firepower he so chooses, … is the exact opposite of being well regulated. As we see with every new report of shootings, it promotes anarchy.

If we assume that a civilian population is required to keep arms to protect itself from tyranny,  then by the words of the Constitution itself,… we have to regulate those very arms…

We can regulate them by banning assault rifles.  We can regulate them by banning high capacity clips.  We can regulate them by registering every firearm to a single owner, and holding that single owner accountable for whatever accident befalls that gun.  We can regulate them by requiring insurance, and if there are those who refuse to abide by the constitutional regulations, we can incarcerate  them and be done with them.

The Constitution allows for firearms, only IF THEY ARE WELL REGULATED….

So, in order to validate the Constitution, let’s regulate all firearms…..  Failure to do so, is a violation of the Founding Father’s own principles, and is unconstitutional….

It says so right there in the Second Amendment.   Care to read it?

About these ads