<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2012:  These Unconventional Conventions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/09/07/2012-these-unconventional-conventions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/09/07/2012-these-unconventional-conventions/</link>
	<description>Just another Delaware WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/09/07/2012-these-unconventional-conventions/#comment-13463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=9077#comment-13463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment - Part 2 of 2

Nature engineered the compatibility of earth and life. Exxon&#039;s CEO is perfectly content to make every last dollar while destroying that compatibility, using  the new excuse, (denial of knowledge of the damages,) - saying the extent is unknown, when legitimate climate scientists agree and events now prove,  the link between anthropogenic CO2 and known damages are real and are scientifically documented.  The glove fits.

This also fits.  Burning coal = energy $  + damages.  Life is being altered, taken, from a life sustaining planet. Mr. fossil fuel CEO is saying, I&#039;m not sliding my hand into that bloody glove, even though it would fit.

The money will be made. The extent of the effects will grow so large, those largely responsible will say, we didn&#039;t know and now.. we can&#039;t afford to fix it.

The fossil fuel industry wants our life sustaining planet  to remain, un regulated.

Someone ask the republicans, how THEY will see that people keep - their coastal properties, their farms, their drinking water, their glacier mountain tops, their weather patterns, their normal temperatures, their normal jobs and lives, their normal  rising sea levels, their polar ice caps,  the millions of acres of permafrost - frozen. 

How will Rmoney, et al refreeze the polar caps; put the resulting released methane gas, back into an unfrozen polar landscape?

Too big to fail

Rmoney/Ryan, et al can strut the stage as&#039; normal,&#039; but they appear to be two fossil fuel crazed puppets. The &#039;normal&#039; that voters should be interested in is - their normal planet.  

Too big to fail

The republicans&#039; fossil fuel CO2  &#039;engineering problem,&#039; will be changing the lives of billions of people around the world,  many with  little or no history of over releasing CO2, many with no carbon footprint as they use so little energy.    Exactly how could Rmoney - &#039;help billions of people around the world, let alone millions of Americans?  

Too big to fail.
   
The fossil fuel industries should pay for  &#039;adaptation,&#039; especially since legitimate climate scientists &#039;do&#039; know what many (but not all) of the results are/will be and  do know,  unstoppable feedback systems are already kicking in.

The real &#039;engineering problem&#039;  -  the burning of fossil fuels and the free  releasing of CO2 - must be dealt with.

Climate change is the most critical but ignored problem facing America and the world. 

Too big to fail. 

The fossil fuel CEO refers to the results of climate change,  as  &#039;engineering problems.&#039;  How can he pretend they can solve &#039;engineering problems&#039; being caused around the world, when they claim -  effects can&#039;t proven? How will the Exxon CEO &#039;engineer&#039; climate deaths?

Someone needs to remind the fossil fuel industries, they can&#039;t even burn coal or oil, without creating CO2. 

The most republicans plan to  do - is hold the whole world hostage to anthropogenic CO2 - the fossil fuel weapon of mass destruction.

Is that what a &#039;normal&#039; politician should do?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment &#8211; Part 2 of 2</p>
<p>Nature engineered the compatibility of earth and life. Exxon&#8217;s CEO is perfectly content to make every last dollar while destroying that compatibility, using  the new excuse, (denial of knowledge of the damages,) &#8211; saying the extent is unknown, when legitimate climate scientists agree and events now prove,  the link between anthropogenic CO2 and known damages are real and are scientifically documented.  The glove fits.</p>
<p>This also fits.  Burning coal = energy $  + damages.  Life is being altered, taken, from a life sustaining planet. Mr. fossil fuel CEO is saying, I&#8217;m not sliding my hand into that bloody glove, even though it would fit.</p>
<p>The money will be made. The extent of the effects will grow so large, those largely responsible will say, we didn&#8217;t know and now.. we can&#8217;t afford to fix it.</p>
<p>The fossil fuel industry wants our life sustaining planet  to remain, un regulated.</p>
<p>Someone ask the republicans, how THEY will see that people keep &#8211; their coastal properties, their farms, their drinking water, their glacier mountain tops, their weather patterns, their normal temperatures, their normal jobs and lives, their normal  rising sea levels, their polar ice caps,  the millions of acres of permafrost &#8211; frozen. </p>
<p>How will Rmoney, et al refreeze the polar caps; put the resulting released methane gas, back into an unfrozen polar landscape?</p>
<p>Too big to fail</p>
<p>Rmoney/Ryan, et al can strut the stage as&#8217; normal,&#8217; but they appear to be two fossil fuel crazed puppets. The &#8216;normal&#8217; that voters should be interested in is &#8211; their normal planet.  </p>
<p>Too big to fail</p>
<p>The republicans&#8217; fossil fuel CO2  &#8216;engineering problem,&#8217; will be changing the lives of billions of people around the world,  many with  little or no history of over releasing CO2, many with no carbon footprint as they use so little energy.    Exactly how could Rmoney &#8211; &#8216;help billions of people around the world, let alone millions of Americans?  </p>
<p>Too big to fail.</p>
<p>The fossil fuel industries should pay for  &#8216;adaptation,&#8217; especially since legitimate climate scientists &#8216;do&#8217; know what many (but not all) of the results are/will be and  do know,  unstoppable feedback systems are already kicking in.</p>
<p>The real &#8216;engineering problem&#8217;  &#8211;  the burning of fossil fuels and the free  releasing of CO2 &#8211; must be dealt with.</p>
<p>Climate change is the most critical but ignored problem facing America and the world. </p>
<p>Too big to fail. </p>
<p>The fossil fuel CEO refers to the results of climate change,  as  &#8216;engineering problems.&#8217;  How can he pretend they can solve &#8216;engineering problems&#8217; being caused around the world, when they claim &#8211;  effects can&#8217;t proven? How will the Exxon CEO &#8216;engineer&#8217; climate deaths?</p>
<p>Someone needs to remind the fossil fuel industries, they can&#8217;t even burn coal or oil, without creating CO2. </p>
<p>The most republicans plan to  do &#8211; is hold the whole world hostage to anthropogenic CO2 &#8211; the fossil fuel weapon of mass destruction.</p>
<p>Is that what a &#8216;normal&#8217; politician should do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/09/07/2012-these-unconventional-conventions/#comment-13462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=9077#comment-13462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment - Part 1 of 2

Well, at least  Biden and Obama didn&#039;t mock the planet and all life. I think they let people know, they know that &#039;they&#039; need to address  the problem, unlike Rmoney, et al.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbkYBGVVpSc

And as far as Rmoney&#039;s promise &#039;to help you and your family&#039; goes, ha, sure he will.  

Rmoney&#039;s saying let the fossil fuel industries drill, frack and shale, baby, without restriction, without regulation, with environmental laws, without acknowledgement, without competition, without accountability, with financial responsibility. Republicans will help &#039;you people,&#039; how?

http://www.wtsp.com/video/1709880106001/1/RAW-VIDEO-Exxon-Mobil-CEO-Defends-Fossil-Fuels

Here&#039;s Exxon CEO, decades into the acknowledgement that CO2 causes the global warming,  still clinging to an alternative form of denial - denying the validity of decades of peer reviewed studies by climate scientists  -  because the CEO claims, he doesn&#039;t know the &#039;extent of effects.&#039;   Instead he  talks about &#039;adaptation&#039; (adapting to dire conditions,) of those effects, without mentioning the likely extent of damages calculated by legitimate climate scientists, the  cost of lives, or costs of damages. The fossil fuel industries know the cause  and  they are aware of the effects. Exxon CEO calls a changing planet, an &#039;&#039;engineering problem&#039; that people &#039;can&#039; adapt to. Just because he can&#039;t and won&#039;t define the extent of the &#039;problem&#039; - doesn&#039;t mean people should give up their properties, infrastructure, drinking water, farms, lives, etc.   

Is  an anthopogenically CO2 changed  planet - an &#039;engineering problem? No.  The &#039;engineering problem&#039; is within the coal plant, within the fossil fuel industries, etc.  Coal plants are chemical plants that release their by-product CO2 into the atmosphere. There is no known engineering solution - to burning fossil fuels without the release of CO2. The coal plant is the &#039;engineering problem,&#039; because it changes the planet.   The lying Exxon CEO calls the resulting changing planet - the problem. The Earth - is not the problem. Everyone knows,   fossil fuel burning and releasing - is the &#039;engineering problem.&#039;

Are there restrictions on nuclear plants releasing the products of their chemical reactions?  Of course there are.  The free, unregulated burning and releasing of fossil fuels,  is no less dire. Left unchecked - it is said to be catastrophic. 

People need to recognize fossil fuel lies and greed. 

(continued..)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment &#8211; Part 1 of 2</p>
<p>Well, at least  Biden and Obama didn&#8217;t mock the planet and all life. I think they let people know, they know that &#8216;they&#8217; need to address  the problem, unlike Rmoney, et al.</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='490' height='306' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/GbkYBGVVpSc?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>And as far as Rmoney&#8217;s promise &#8216;to help you and your family&#8217; goes, ha, sure he will.  </p>
<p>Rmoney&#8217;s saying let the fossil fuel industries drill, frack and shale, baby, without restriction, without regulation, with environmental laws, without acknowledgement, without competition, without accountability, with financial responsibility. Republicans will help &#8216;you people,&#8217; how?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wtsp.com/video/1709880106001/1/RAW-VIDEO-Exxon-Mobil-CEO-Defends-Fossil-Fuels" rel="nofollow">http://www.wtsp.com/video/1709880106001/1/RAW-VIDEO-Exxon-Mobil-CEO-Defends-Fossil-Fuels</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Exxon CEO, decades into the acknowledgement that CO2 causes the global warming,  still clinging to an alternative form of denial &#8211; denying the validity of decades of peer reviewed studies by climate scientists  &#8211;  because the CEO claims, he doesn&#8217;t know the &#8216;extent of effects.&#8217;   Instead he  talks about &#8216;adaptation&#8217; (adapting to dire conditions,) of those effects, without mentioning the likely extent of damages calculated by legitimate climate scientists, the  cost of lives, or costs of damages. The fossil fuel industries know the cause  and  they are aware of the effects. Exxon CEO calls a changing planet, an &#8221;engineering problem&#8217; that people &#8216;can&#8217; adapt to. Just because he can&#8217;t and won&#8217;t define the extent of the &#8216;problem&#8217; &#8211; doesn&#8217;t mean people should give up their properties, infrastructure, drinking water, farms, lives, etc.   </p>
<p>Is  an anthopogenically CO2 changed  planet &#8211; an &#8216;engineering problem? No.  The &#8216;engineering problem&#8217; is within the coal plant, within the fossil fuel industries, etc.  Coal plants are chemical plants that release their by-product CO2 into the atmosphere. There is no known engineering solution &#8211; to burning fossil fuels without the release of CO2. The coal plant is the &#8216;engineering problem,&#8217; because it changes the planet.   The lying Exxon CEO calls the resulting changing planet &#8211; the problem. The Earth &#8211; is not the problem. Everyone knows,   fossil fuel burning and releasing &#8211; is the &#8216;engineering problem.&#8217;</p>
<p>Are there restrictions on nuclear plants releasing the products of their chemical reactions?  Of course there are.  The free, unregulated burning and releasing of fossil fuels,  is no less dire. Left unchecked &#8211; it is said to be catastrophic. </p>
<p>People need to recognize fossil fuel lies and greed. </p>
<p>(continued..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
