<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Study Puts Caesar Rodney Institute Into Filthy Toilet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/british-study-puts-cesar-rodney-institute-into-filthy-toilet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/british-study-puts-cesar-rodney-institute-into-filthy-toilet/</link>
	<description>Just another Delaware WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:00:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/british-study-puts-cesar-rodney-institute-into-filthy-toilet/#comment-13162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=8933#comment-13162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s  &#039;Legitimate Rape?&#039; 

Rmoney&#039;s selling his Plan in front of 

a sign that reads:

&quot;Energy Independence by 2020 - the Romney plan for a stronger middle class&quot;

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/23/13437385-romney-debuts-energy-plan-in-oil-rich-new-mexico?lite

He says he will:

Streamline fossil fuel permit process
for energy development on federal lands 
and offshore drilling
build a Keystone Pipeline,

while abandoning subsidies and loans for wind, solar,

while embracing subsidies and tax breaks for the big oil and gas companies.

Is that &#039;legitimate rape?&#039;

Can middle class republicans see that he&#039;s talking about making America  &#039;dependent,&#039;  the opposite of &#039;independent,&#039;

of the fossil fuel industries that will be  even richer, more powerful, more destructive of the climate.

Is that &#039;legitimate rape?&#039;

Plug that in with Rmoney&#039;s package to exclude CO2 as a pollutant from the Clean Air Act along with the Rmoney promise for free releasing,  untaxed, un regulated disposal  of CO2.

In other words, Rmoney&#039;s saying he can deliver, more fossil fuels - with no accountability - for the resulting damages by the  fossil fuel industries.

Someone needs to  ask,.  What about  the case of causing climate change. Should it be legal or not.

What about promising  voters jobs, that will further climate change, for which the public will have to pay the price, as the fossil fuel industries are supported and enriched without responsibility for climate damages?

&#039;You know uh, uh, people always want to try to make that as one of those things, how do ya how do ya, slice this particularly tough ethical question?

Say legitimate climate change isn&#039;t legitimately happening and besides.... the planet has ways to shut that whole thing down.

Well ... it can cease being a livable planet.


http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2012/08/todd-akin-legitimate-rape-victims-rarely-get-pregnant.html


How can  a republican candidate for President, claim to be pro life, if he is pro climate change?

Republican voters need to start calculating the human deaths, suffering, hardships, life changes, financial losses, damages, etc.of climate change victims, before they think about putting  Rmoney/Ryan, Inc in the position to  &#039;legitimately&#039; rape the climate that sustains the life of  all children of the world.

http://www.greenmuze.com/climate/heat/1164-climate-change-death-toll.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/18/climate-change-costs-report_n_850810.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s  &#8216;Legitimate Rape?&#8217; </p>
<p>Rmoney&#8217;s selling his Plan in front of </p>
<p>a sign that reads:</p>
<p>&#8220;Energy Independence by 2020 &#8211; the Romney plan for a stronger middle class&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/23/13437385-romney-debuts-energy-plan-in-oil-rich-new-mexico?lite" rel="nofollow">http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/23/13437385-romney-debuts-energy-plan-in-oil-rich-new-mexico?lite</a></p>
<p>He says he will:</p>
<p>Streamline fossil fuel permit process<br />
for energy development on federal lands<br />
and offshore drilling<br />
build a Keystone Pipeline,</p>
<p>while abandoning subsidies and loans for wind, solar,</p>
<p>while embracing subsidies and tax breaks for the big oil and gas companies.</p>
<p>Is that &#8216;legitimate rape?&#8217;</p>
<p>Can middle class republicans see that he&#8217;s talking about making America  &#8216;dependent,&#8217;  the opposite of &#8216;independent,&#8217;</p>
<p>of the fossil fuel industries that will be  even richer, more powerful, more destructive of the climate.</p>
<p>Is that &#8216;legitimate rape?&#8217;</p>
<p>Plug that in with Rmoney&#8217;s package to exclude CO2 as a pollutant from the Clean Air Act along with the Rmoney promise for free releasing,  untaxed, un regulated disposal  of CO2.</p>
<p>In other words, Rmoney&#8217;s saying he can deliver, more fossil fuels &#8211; with no accountability &#8211; for the resulting damages by the  fossil fuel industries.</p>
<p>Someone needs to  ask,.  What about  the case of causing climate change. Should it be legal or not.</p>
<p>What about promising  voters jobs, that will further climate change, for which the public will have to pay the price, as the fossil fuel industries are supported and enriched without responsibility for climate damages?</p>
<p>&#8216;You know uh, uh, people always want to try to make that as one of those things, how do ya how do ya, slice this particularly tough ethical question?</p>
<p>Say legitimate climate change isn&#8217;t legitimately happening and besides&#8230;. the planet has ways to shut that whole thing down.</p>
<p>Well &#8230; it can cease being a livable planet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2012/08/todd-akin-legitimate-rape-victims-rarely-get-pregnant.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2012/08/todd-akin-legitimate-rape-victims-rarely-get-pregnant.html</a></p>
<p>How can  a republican candidate for President, claim to be pro life, if he is pro climate change?</p>
<p>Republican voters need to start calculating the human deaths, suffering, hardships, life changes, financial losses, damages, etc.of climate change victims, before they think about putting  Rmoney/Ryan, Inc in the position to  &#8216;legitimately&#8217; rape the climate that sustains the life of  all children of the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greenmuze.com/climate/heat/1164-climate-change-death-toll.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenmuze.com/climate/heat/1164-climate-change-death-toll.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/18/climate-change-costs-report_n_850810.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/18/climate-change-costs-report_n_850810.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
