has become the ‘rich guy (refusing to release his taxes) candidate.’

Rmoney believes taxes on the rich and corporations should be lowered, How low can he go? Most likely, his missing tax returns would reveal that.

Rmoney has one horrendous tax plan for the people, however. The Tax Policy Center labored to make Romney’s promises add up, but every simulation ended with a tax increase on the middle class.

“The tax cuts Romney is offering to the rich are simply larger than the size of the (non-investment) deductions and loopholes that exist for the rich. That’s why it’s “mathematically impossible” for Romney’s plan to produce anything but a tax increase on the middle class.”

“Romney has promised to increase defense spending and hold benefits steady for the current generation of seniors. The only remaining big spending programs are those that help the poorest; that is where Romney’s cuts would have to be concentrated.

What a plan. Increase taxes on the middle class, curtail programs for the poorest, to pay for tax cuts for the richest.

The question remains. When you have a ‘plan’ for the 1-2% richest Americans (that includes Rmoney’s corporate ‘people,’ how can Rmoney get the poor and middle class republicans to cut their own throats and vote republican?

Here’s what Rmoney economic plan looks like:

http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2011/12/13/n_mitt_romney_econ_plan.cnnmoney/

Most outrageously, no new costs for regulations. Of course there will be regulations. Romney wants the people to pay the costs of corporate regulations. Haven’t republican voters figured out republican politicians have been lying to them regarding something as huge and planet destroying as climate change? Think about the costs involved in CO2 regulations to save our planet. The polluting corporations are making trillions dumping CO2 into our atmosphere for free. Romney is, at the same time, claiming CO2 is not a pollutant. Romney’s saying, No regulations.. but if there are regulations…no new costs for regulations. That says, no CO2 tax. That says, have the people pay, if they want fossil fuel industries to stop using the people’s air, lands and waters, as free hazardous waste dump sites. What republican would vote for such an evil plan? Do middle class republicans think they should have to pay multi billion dollar corporate ‘people’ so they might stop destroying the planet? Imagine Rmoney and the 1% having the audacity to want to use the people’s government to accomplish such an arrangement.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/climate-change-is-here–and-worse-than-we-thought/2012/08/03/6ae604c2-dd90-11e1-8e43-4a3c4375504a_story.html

http://co2now.org/