<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chik-Fil-A &#8230;Hate Da Gays&#8230;..Chik-Fil-A &#8230;. Hate Da Gays&#8230;..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/</link>
	<description>Just another Delaware WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/#comment-12859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 03:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=8775#comment-12859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t usually pay attention to this subject. I have no dog in the fight. But &#039;guest&#039; causes one to think about what&#039;s going on.

&#039;Guest&#039; says, &quot;Deviation is not biologically part of the human design?&quot; He overlooks  that all people are individuals of the &#039;human race.&#039; A &#039;paper&#039; analogy doesn&#039;t apply. What guest substitutes  as &#039;paper,&#039; is in fact a human being to all other human beings.  Does guest suppose there aren&#039;t  trillions of ugly  heterosexual encounters resulting in &#039;reproductive dead ends,&#039; billions of  married men, women in &#039;non re productive encounters,&#039; or  having sex with someone else or old men popping  billions of little blue pharmaceutical  pills, or married couples having sex, Ugh, when they despise each other for that matter,  or having  no sex at all (also &#039;non re productive.&#039;)  
 
A child can&#039;t  take their life back to the complaint window and say, look here, I&#039;m a kid,  I don&#039;t know what&#039;s going on here, but you&#039;ve setting me up for a tough life. Some nasty freak is waiting to call me a biological deviation, compare my human life to a piece of paper.  Now take my life back. It might be easier, if I were  dealt  a straight one.   No can do, next please.

So there he has it - 70-80 years of life to lead.  He looks in the mirror, well, he doesn&#039;t look too bad; he has all his parts, brains functioning well, childhood wasn&#039;t too bad,  He gets educated, employed, has interests, friends, pays a 31% tax rate,  becomes a republican, starts his own business, is  self sufficient, law abiding, a loved family member,  a  kind, thoughtful human being.  

Now he faces 50-60 years of adult life. There&#039;s a hitch. He isn&#039;t attracted to the opposite sex. Perhaps, he could have had an easier life; he knew this was coming, but, that&#039;s  the life he was given to live..A life of no less value than any other human life. And there&#039;s &#039;guest&#039; right on Q, Hey you &quot;biological deviant,&quot; you, you, you &quot;non biologically  non human,&quot; you, you &quot;deviation of non reproductive norm.&quot;

Those disgusting sounds are your voice &#039;guest.&#039;  Hear yourself.

Hundreds of millions of people are handed a multitude of human variables that &quot;guest&#039; might  call &quot;deviations of human design.&quot;

In Adolf&#039;s imagined Utopian Germany of &#039;perfect design,&#039;  Adolf thought all people should  have &#039;clean&#039; blood - blonde hair, (not bleached)  blue eyes, and be  highland German, that was his &#039;sexual&#039; preference,  even though he was  not very talented, was crazed, murderous, a common, dark haired Austrian. He made himself leader of &#039;his race&#039;  called Aryan. He told them to have pride in themselves, their working class status and their history.  He also capitalized on their poverty,  racism, hatred of people, and their need of scapegoats. 

It&#039;s sounding too familiar.

Go buy yourself a crate of  mangled, deep fried chicken scraps, guest, then you can sit in a corner, cut paper dolls out of the napkins and  pretend eating some greasy chicken parts, suddenly made you more than a bully of the worst sort.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t usually pay attention to this subject. I have no dog in the fight. But &#8216;guest&#8217; causes one to think about what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>&#8216;Guest&#8217; says, &#8220;Deviation is not biologically part of the human design?&#8221; He overlooks  that all people are individuals of the &#8216;human race.&#8217; A &#8216;paper&#8217; analogy doesn&#8217;t apply. What guest substitutes  as &#8216;paper,&#8217; is in fact a human being to all other human beings.  Does guest suppose there aren&#8217;t  trillions of ugly  heterosexual encounters resulting in &#8216;reproductive dead ends,&#8217; billions of  married men, women in &#8216;non re productive encounters,&#8217; or  having sex with someone else or old men popping  billions of little blue pharmaceutical  pills, or married couples having sex, Ugh, when they despise each other for that matter,  or having  no sex at all (also &#8216;non re productive.&#8217;)  </p>
<p>A child can&#8217;t  take their life back to the complaint window and say, look here, I&#8217;m a kid,  I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going on here, but you&#8217;ve setting me up for a tough life. Some nasty freak is waiting to call me a biological deviation, compare my human life to a piece of paper.  Now take my life back. It might be easier, if I were  dealt  a straight one.   No can do, next please.</p>
<p>So there he has it &#8211; 70-80 years of life to lead.  He looks in the mirror, well, he doesn&#8217;t look too bad; he has all his parts, brains functioning well, childhood wasn&#8217;t too bad,  He gets educated, employed, has interests, friends, pays a 31% tax rate,  becomes a republican, starts his own business, is  self sufficient, law abiding, a loved family member,  a  kind, thoughtful human being.  </p>
<p>Now he faces 50-60 years of adult life. There&#8217;s a hitch. He isn&#8217;t attracted to the opposite sex. Perhaps, he could have had an easier life; he knew this was coming, but, that&#8217;s  the life he was given to live..A life of no less value than any other human life. And there&#8217;s &#8216;guest&#8217; right on Q, Hey you &#8220;biological deviant,&#8221; you, you, you &#8220;non biologically  non human,&#8221; you, you &#8220;deviation of non reproductive norm.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those disgusting sounds are your voice &#8216;guest.&#8217;  Hear yourself.</p>
<p>Hundreds of millions of people are handed a multitude of human variables that &#8220;guest&#8217; might  call &#8220;deviations of human design.&#8221;</p>
<p>In Adolf&#8217;s imagined Utopian Germany of &#8216;perfect design,&#8217;  Adolf thought all people should  have &#8216;clean&#8217; blood &#8211; blonde hair, (not bleached)  blue eyes, and be  highland German, that was his &#8216;sexual&#8217; preference,  even though he was  not very talented, was crazed, murderous, a common, dark haired Austrian. He made himself leader of &#8216;his race&#8217;  called Aryan. He told them to have pride in themselves, their working class status and their history.  He also capitalized on their poverty,  racism, hatred of people, and their need of scapegoats. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sounding too familiar.</p>
<p>Go buy yourself a crate of  mangled, deep fried chicken scraps, guest, then you can sit in a corner, cut paper dolls out of the napkins and  pretend eating some greasy chicken parts, suddenly made you more than a bully of the worst sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kavips</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/#comment-12847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kavips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=8775#comment-12847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granted it is a dead reproductive end.  But you totally fail to comprehend the emotional substance behind the whole controversy.  Instead of race, which contrary to what you say is very similar in its controversy, let us turn the tables upon your beliefs...

I assume you are heterosexual and will carry that through this role play... 

You are the only one in your family that is heterosexual. You are the only one in your church that is heterosexual, You are the only one in your workplace that is heterosexual. You are the only one in a restaurant that is heterosexual... When you go out, the gay guys snicker at you when you walk by their table.  Often you hear silence until you are fifteen feet away and then the whole table breaks out in laughter. You constantly see eyes rolling at your expense everywhere you go.  You are queer. You don&#039;t belong in society.  You have to act gay to get a job.. You have to comment on the bulge in the crotch of the same sex interviewer sent to cover your application.  You have to lick your lips and look him in the eye, in order to hopefully find a source of income.  You go to church, and all the gay old ladies whisper as you walk by.  The gay pastor never looks at you in the eye.  You are a pariah.  You would be much better off dead.

If you stay out late, someone will gladly do you that favor....

Someone tries to bring up the injustice of your case.  They try to find out a way to build a bridge, to get gays to understand that you are really a normal person, that you just happen to like people of the other sex, is there any crime in that.?

You know what the crowd says to that statement made in your behalf??  C&#039;mon, I&#039;m sure you can guess...  Can&#039;t you?


Well, I&#039;ll help you out... They say you are &lt;i&gt;a deviation from a reproductive norm.  Everyone knows you make babies in test tubes now.&lt;/i&gt;  They say &lt;i&gt; if you can find out what causes heterosexuality, they will have people lining up to make their babies homosexual..&lt;/i&gt;  They say.... &lt;i&gt;portray themselves as a contingent of society requiring special laws and consideration rather than trying to address AND CORRECT the medical, physiological and psychological effects of a biological deviation.&lt;/i&gt;

Because you see, .... in their world, you ARE a deviation.  You ARE queer.  You are an aberration, an anomaly, a ghastly freak of nature.... 

So... you who are so sure of yourself... Would  you become gay...?  Would accept that since everyone was telling you gay was normal, and you weren&#039;t gay, that somehow or other, you also weren&#039;t normal?  So sure of yourself?  If every thing including the church was supportive of gay, would you succumb and pretend to like licking the privates of the same sex, even though everything inside was telling you otherwise?

You wouldn&#039;t?  You mean to tell me that you would listen to what the inside of your body was telling you,from childhood to this very moment, that you were somehow meant to fall in love with the OPPOSITE sex, even though every institution was telling you that you were crazy?  Would you seek out and find those others within your society who also somehow seemed to be weird like you, and also like members of the opposite sex?  

And when the gay owner of a large chicken eatery  says that: he finds it offensive if someone even attempts to tell him we all have to be OK with heterosexuality,  when in his view it is a biological deviation, would you then accept it God&#039;s truth over what your own body itself was telling you?

You wouldn&#039;t?  REALLY?

Hypocrite. ......

 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted it is a dead reproductive end.  But you totally fail to comprehend the emotional substance behind the whole controversy.  Instead of race, which contrary to what you say is very similar in its controversy, let us turn the tables upon your beliefs&#8230;</p>
<p>I assume you are heterosexual and will carry that through this role play&#8230; </p>
<p>You are the only one in your family that is heterosexual. You are the only one in your church that is heterosexual, You are the only one in your workplace that is heterosexual. You are the only one in a restaurant that is heterosexual&#8230; When you go out, the gay guys snicker at you when you walk by their table.  Often you hear silence until you are fifteen feet away and then the whole table breaks out in laughter. You constantly see eyes rolling at your expense everywhere you go.  You are queer. You don&#8217;t belong in society.  You have to act gay to get a job.. You have to comment on the bulge in the crotch of the same sex interviewer sent to cover your application.  You have to lick your lips and look him in the eye, in order to hopefully find a source of income.  You go to church, and all the gay old ladies whisper as you walk by.  The gay pastor never looks at you in the eye.  You are a pariah.  You would be much better off dead.</p>
<p>If you stay out late, someone will gladly do you that favor&#8230;.</p>
<p>Someone tries to bring up the injustice of your case.  They try to find out a way to build a bridge, to get gays to understand that you are really a normal person, that you just happen to like people of the other sex, is there any crime in that.?</p>
<p>You know what the crowd says to that statement made in your behalf??  C&#8217;mon, I&#8217;m sure you can guess&#8230;  Can&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ll help you out&#8230; They say you are <i>a deviation from a reproductive norm.  Everyone knows you make babies in test tubes now.</i>  They say <i> if you can find out what causes heterosexuality, they will have people lining up to make their babies homosexual..</i>  They say&#8230;. <i>portray themselves as a contingent of society requiring special laws and consideration rather than trying to address AND CORRECT the medical, physiological and psychological effects of a biological deviation.</i></p>
<p>Because you see, &#8230;. in their world, you ARE a deviation.  You ARE queer.  You are an aberration, an anomaly, a ghastly freak of nature&#8230;. </p>
<p>So&#8230; you who are so sure of yourself&#8230; Would  you become gay&#8230;?  Would accept that since everyone was telling you gay was normal, and you weren&#8217;t gay, that somehow or other, you also weren&#8217;t normal?  So sure of yourself?  If every thing including the church was supportive of gay, would you succumb and pretend to like licking the privates of the same sex, even though everything inside was telling you otherwise?</p>
<p>You wouldn&#8217;t?  You mean to tell me that you would listen to what the inside of your body was telling you,from childhood to this very moment, that you were somehow meant to fall in love with the OPPOSITE sex, even though every institution was telling you that you were crazy?  Would you seek out and find those others within your society who also somehow seemed to be weird like you, and also like members of the opposite sex?  </p>
<p>And when the gay owner of a large chicken eatery  says that: he finds it offensive if someone even attempts to tell him we all have to be OK with heterosexuality,  when in his view it is a biological deviation, would you then accept it God&#8217;s truth over what your own body itself was telling you?</p>
<p>You wouldn&#8217;t?  REALLY?</p>
<p>Hypocrite. &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/#comment-12837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=8775#comment-12837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately you fail to recognize some nuances of this debate.  I do not discriminate or hate &quot;DA GAYS&quot; but homosexuality is in its basic form a deviation from a reproductive norm.  Is sex only for reproduction? No, but if in your intellectual evaluation of homosexuality were to be extended just a little, you&#039;d have to see that it is a reproductive dead end. If they reach a  point where they can identify what causes homosexuality, (i.e.: womb chromosonal exposure) then I would wager they will have parents lining up to insure their children are not homosexual.  It is not that homosexuals are bad people or that they can simply &quot;choose&quot; to be straight.  It is that the deviation is not biologically part of the human design.  There is no doubt some individuals are homosexuals but is that really something to embrace,  promote and foster as beneficial?  If an individual is a hermaphrodyte, do they really view themselves as normal? It is not that those individuals should be treated poorly but the discussion has attempted to portray homosexuals as though they are members of a unique race. They have attempted to portray themselves as a contigent of society requiring special laws and consideration rather than trying to address AND CORRECT the medical, physiological and psychological effects of a biological deviation.  Would it be reasonable to assign quotas for how many homosexuals are on a government job? In a department? On staff?  I would say no it isn&#039;t yet here you are trying to say that Chik Fil A is a gay hater. Chik Fil A may be referring more to religious teachings to justify its position but the root of it is the resistance to endorse behavior and lifestyle that is based on rather murky justifications.  

I don&#039;t care if you (or whoever) is gay, but I do care if you attempt to tell me I have to be OK with it when in my view it is a biological deviation. It is like holding up a piece of paper and I say it is paper but you demand that I call it wood pulp.  You can demand it but in the end it IS paper.  The demand to call it wood pulp may not necessarily be inaccurate but the demand denies that it is paper to everybody else. 

Demanding a person or business recognize something they have a disagreement about is akin to holding someone down to say uncle.  They may do it but you have not convinced them you&#039;re their uncle. In fact, they probably want to call you something else instead. It doesn&#039;t build bridges.

NO, homosexuality is NOT the same as race. It is a far different issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately you fail to recognize some nuances of this debate.  I do not discriminate or hate &#8220;DA GAYS&#8221; but homosexuality is in its basic form a deviation from a reproductive norm.  Is sex only for reproduction? No, but if in your intellectual evaluation of homosexuality were to be extended just a little, you&#8217;d have to see that it is a reproductive dead end. If they reach a  point where they can identify what causes homosexuality, (i.e.: womb chromosonal exposure) then I would wager they will have parents lining up to insure their children are not homosexual.  It is not that homosexuals are bad people or that they can simply &#8220;choose&#8221; to be straight.  It is that the deviation is not biologically part of the human design.  There is no doubt some individuals are homosexuals but is that really something to embrace,  promote and foster as beneficial?  If an individual is a hermaphrodyte, do they really view themselves as normal? It is not that those individuals should be treated poorly but the discussion has attempted to portray homosexuals as though they are members of a unique race. They have attempted to portray themselves as a contigent of society requiring special laws and consideration rather than trying to address AND CORRECT the medical, physiological and psychological effects of a biological deviation.  Would it be reasonable to assign quotas for how many homosexuals are on a government job? In a department? On staff?  I would say no it isn&#8217;t yet here you are trying to say that Chik Fil A is a gay hater. Chik Fil A may be referring more to religious teachings to justify its position but the root of it is the resistance to endorse behavior and lifestyle that is based on rather murky justifications.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if you (or whoever) is gay, but I do care if you attempt to tell me I have to be OK with it when in my view it is a biological deviation. It is like holding up a piece of paper and I say it is paper but you demand that I call it wood pulp.  You can demand it but in the end it IS paper.  The demand to call it wood pulp may not necessarily be inaccurate but the demand denies that it is paper to everybody else. </p>
<p>Demanding a person or business recognize something they have a disagreement about is akin to holding someone down to say uncle.  They may do it but you have not convinced them you&#8217;re their uncle. In fact, they probably want to call you something else instead. It doesn&#8217;t build bridges.</p>
<p>NO, homosexuality is NOT the same as race. It is a far different issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kavips</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/#comment-12834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kavips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=8775#comment-12834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does that have to do with anything?  Except perhaps to cause everyone to wonder what horrible thing happened within the Republican party to steer the Republicans wrong completely off the road and over the cliff into a swarming ocean pounding against basalt.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does that have to do with anything?  Except perhaps to cause everyone to wonder what horrible thing happened within the Republican party to steer the Republicans wrong completely off the road and over the cliff into a swarming ocean pounding against basalt.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justme</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/#comment-12829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=8775#comment-12829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a BS answer.  PS Republicans freed the slaves and fought for integration.  Democrats opposed both.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a BS answer.  PS Republicans freed the slaves and fought for integration.  Democrats opposed both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kavips</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/#comment-12827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kavips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=8775#comment-12827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is a great question.  Not so much for the obvious answer that there was no outrage to be outrageous over, but over the fact that is shows how we have to move forward in little bits.  First acceptance that gays weren&#039;t queer. Then military service. Then civil unions. Then openness in the military. Then gay marriage... because... really, why not?

Good thing blacks were integrated in the military as early as &#039;49 is all I can say... 
Yay.. Harry....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a great question.  Not so much for the obvious answer that there was no outrage to be outrageous over, but over the fact that is shows how we have to move forward in little bits.  First acceptance that gays weren&#8217;t queer. Then military service. Then civil unions. Then openness in the military. Then gay marriage&#8230; because&#8230; really, why not?</p>
<p>Good thing blacks were integrated in the military as early as &#8217;49 is all I can say&#8230;<br />
Yay.. Harry&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justme</title>
		<link>http://kavips.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays-chik-fil-a-hate-da-gays/#comment-12825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kavips.wordpress.com/?p=8775#comment-12825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chik Fil A has the same position on same sex marriage the Obama had for the last 30 years.  Where was your outrage then?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chik Fil A has the same position on same sex marriage the Obama had for the last 30 years.  Where was your outrage then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
